| MoneyWisdom.info |
|
|
Welcome! |
|
![]() Identity theft (or identity fraud) is the deliberate assumption of another person's identity, usually to gain access to their finances or frame them for a crime. Less commonly, it is to enable illegal immigration, terrorism, espionage, or changing identity permanently. It may also be a means of blackmail, especially if medical privacy or political privacy has been breached, and if revealing the activities undertaken by the thief under the name of the victim would have serious consequences like loss of job or marriage. While identity theft appears to cover the entire waterfront of bad acts done while pretending to be someone else, assuming a false identity with the knowledge and approval of the person being impersonated, such as for cheating on an exam, is not considered to be identity theft. Because identity theft is so broad a concept any discussion of it should quickly narrow down to the specific case like credit card fraud. Likewise any proposed remedy of identity theft is in actuality a remedy for a specific case of identity theft, with the unachieveable exception of 100% perfect verification like biometrics. Techniques for obtaining identification information range from the crude, such as stealing mail or rummaging through rubbish (dumpster diving in the USA), stealing personal information in computer databases, to infiltration of organizations that store large amounts of personal information. Identity theft is usually the result of serious breaches of privacy. Except for the simplest credit-related cases, it is usually not possible without breakdowns in
Country dependenceIt seems that the prevalence of identity theft and the seriousness of typical cases is quite dependent on the country and the legal system and commercial habits there. Most countries in Continental Europe, for example, require their citizens to own ID cards which are needed to prove one's own identity on numerous occasions, such as opening (or even accessing) bank accounts, renting cars, checking in at hotels etc. As ID cards are in general as hard to counterfeit as money, and one usually has to physically show the card, it requires substantial criminal effort to commit fraud. Being used to this standard, businesses are unlikely to accept an ID verification by means of "semi-secret" personal information such as social security numbers to ascertain an identity. Maybe because of this, it is also less common to do business by phone as it is e.g. in the USA. So, the threat posed by "simple" identity theft, which relies on obtaining "semi-secret" information such as social security or credit card numbers depends on how much can be done with this information. Is it, for example, possible to open an account using false ID in form of a stolen SSN, and so wreck the victim's credit record? Do banks accept credit card payments without signature or PIN? Differences in such legal framework may explain the large differences in damages due to identity theft in different countries. [edit]
Consequences of identity theftIn many parts of the world, identity theft is the fastest growing offence. However, in the USA, a longitudinal 2005 study by Javelin Strategy & Research [1] showed that the crime had leveled off since a 2003 study from the Federal Trade Commission [2] was released in 2003. The most recent US Javelin data also showed that 9.3 million individuals (or 4.25% of all adults) are victims of identity fraud on an annual basis. In the United Kingdom in 2005 the consumer group Which? issued a report claiming that one in four people had been the victim of identity theft, or knew someone who had been a victim. This misleading claim (linking victims with those who know victims in a single statistic) achieved wide publicity. The Home Office in Britain does not collate data on identity theft, but does, nonetheless, claim that the activity is reaching epidemic proportions. It is difficult to fully quantify the extent of real personal privacy breaches, as laws requiring disclosure of such instances are just coming into existence. [edit]
Creditor negligence contributing to increase; other factorsInstances of identity theft have increased as the willingness of lenders like issuers of credit cards to extend credit without physical human contact, the ability to transact sales and other business at a distance (online and via telephone), and the availability of personal information, and its volume held by third parties, has increased. In the USA much personal information, including mortgage details, social security numbers, and driving license details, are publicly available. Such sensitive information is far harder to obtain in most other countries, but it is typically held by numerous government and private sector bodies, and is consequently available to their many employees and associate organisations. Of particular concern is the comprehensive personal financial information and other related data held by credit reference agencies. The proliferation of junk mail from many of these organisations, which often includes name and address, has exacerbated the situation. In the United Kingdom, companies such as car hire agencies, car dealerships, solicitors and banks now routinely take a copy of identity documents as a condition of doing business. This practice means that the subject is, in effect, losing control of his identity documents. As a result of data protection legislation in the United Kingdom many organisations now require telephone callers to disclose personal details such as date of birth and mother's maiden name before they will enter into discussion. This allows eavesdroppers to collect this data. As a consequence more people are now giving "password responses" on being asked for such information, e.g. by telling the bank their mother's maiden name is Password rather than Smith. U.S. Identity fraud crimes now total $52.6B annually (up 2.3% from the previous survey), with a per-individual total of $5,686 per victim, according to the Javelin study. The Javelin random-sample study further showed that individual victims in the U.S. spend an average 28 hours restoring their affairs, while the majority of their costs are reimbursed by financial providers, who in turn pass much of the cost on to merchants or other service providers. Contrary to popular belief, illegal access to personal information often happens through traditional means such as paper financial statements, cheques or credit cards, and the perpetrator is often someone previously known to the victim, such as a "friend", family member, or acquaintance. It is rumoured that some local authorities in England have their rubbish sorted for recycling by convicts, which represents an additional risk. This friend type of identity theft suggests that privacy guard strategies will not solve the problem and that it is the promiscuous nature of transactions at a distance -- without actual physical human contact -- that enables the fraud. However, if we ban all business from being done online or by phone, then the economy will be seriously harmed, so the solution may lie in serious unbreakable encryption will randomly generated codes and a dual key system. That or a secure line plus biometric verification plus a secured unhackable databased of such biometric data in a central site. [edit]
Precautions against identity theftRigorous research has shown that the following methods will be most effective at preventing identity theft or fraud:
|